Jan 22
TyRain Rant – cut or uncut cocks
Comment:
…and he has a perfect frenulum; the frenulum is the most sensitive part of a man’s body…and one of the parts that is so often removed.
I will now say that I am getting annoyed with many anti-cut cock comments thus far written. I was cut in 1959 and remain happy, thank you very much – growing up that way.
Over the years I have seen men compete – be it looks or how much they earn, not if they were cut or uncut.
Without the USA, porn would not be so freely available on the Internet – porn being our last viable export.
As the USA approaches a depressive economic era, with too much imports and nothing really being exported – give me a fuckin’ break as I expose various images of interest here at TyRain for the MANY tastes of men – not just the uncut elite.
3 comments
3 Comments so far
I was cut when I was 60 years old, and am sorry that I waited so long. Sex is much better now.
I totally agree with you. The anti-cut comments are largely the response of gay men who’ve logged too many hours looking at European male models named “Jirka,” and have developed a lame case of penis envy (probably based more on size with an unconscious transference to foreskin). Nothing’s more annoying than a 30 year old man crying over how he’s been “mutilated” because a centimeter (if that much) of skin that he never remembered having was snipped from his pecker when he was six hours old.
Half to two-thirds of the nerves are in your foreskin; and I have no objection to being cut and glad you enjoy your status; the problem is doing surgery on a patient without his consent; circumcision is the only operation done without knowledge, consent and, most of the time, without anesthesia. Let boys decide when they are older to have their foreskins removed; but a newborn baby has healthy genitals that should be left alone. That is all I meant. No need to consider this a rant…it isn’t. Just common sense.